I took a "wait-and-see" approach. Humans are naturally resistant to change (especially for change they did not agree upon or made themselves consciously), so I tend to not jump in head first with the rest of the crowd typically. But for me, I don't mind the changes and think of it as a new way to view the people I've become friendly with over the years.
I have not been using Google + basically because I find Facebook easier to use and more visually appealing. This is more of a conscious I-don't-want-to-change decision, but also because I think Google is significantly more evil than Facebook is portrayed (especially with people information). Google is a publicly traded company and has shareholders to answer to. While Google has never charged its user base for use of basic items like Gmail and using their search engines, Facebook also has not and never plans to (despite what viral status updates you might read in your friend feed).
And don't get me started on MySpace (owned by the evil of the evil News Corp!), which I left probably before it was ever "cool" to jump from that ship. I was always timed out on that piece of crap, and I found it incredibly tedious to use. I knew the good it could do, but it was such a pain in the ass that I never wanted to log into the system. Once I found Facebook, I took to it like a fish to water and never looked back. I might be a little annoyed by some of their changes but it's a free service and it's enhanced my life for what I like to think to be the better (especially with the flow of information and people meeting I have done over the years as a direct result of it).
Since the new rollout, I haven't heard much from folks in the complaining aspects, but I don't know if that's a combination of complacency, people just not using the application as much or just getting used to things. A few days ago I had a bunch of status updates of people requesting that I unsubscribe to their feeds. I'm sorry...I love you people...but I have better things to do than go through each of my 400 friends and manually unclick themselves from my feed. Not to mention, I really wouldn't know what was going on then! My friend Matt Cerrone (who founded Metsblog and is a social media consultant) basically hit the nail on the head with this analysis on his Facebook wall:
Just remember, when you post that you ate at Chipotle, or rooted for the Mets this weekend, or needed to go to Rite Aid to find batteries for your radio during the hurricane, Facebook is collecting those bits of information to have those corporations better target their audiences. Meeting people and friending and networking is a fringe benefit we get from using the service.
Here's my take on the ire: we get used to the changes that are made to the service over the years, and just accept them with maybe a little holding our nose and swallowing difficulty, but we do it. We feel as though the changes are not about "us," the user of the system and essentially the consumer, but more for Facebook, a "billion dollar business" as Matt suggests above. Well, you would be right. Facebook doesn't give a crap about us, as people...they care about the information that we provide them that they are able to sell as advertising to MAKE MONEY and give themselves a product.
But as the article link suggests above...we are the product, not the consumer. And this is where our difference in thinking lies and potentially needs to change if we want to continue using the service. If not, then try out Google + or get on the Diaspora waiting list. But realize they use people information in the same vein as Facebook does, so don't be fooled that it somehow "gets better" or "is better."
It's not about you, it's about them. Them using information YOU give them, but don't be fooled it is about them.
Love the article, Coopie, but I disagree with Cerrone. I understand why changes are made, but if the majority of FB's users (and I'm not saying that IS the case) don't like the "new" product, what good is it? I know it's free and most people won't stop using it because of these changes, but there is still a certain level of satisfaction that FB needs to make sure is maintained by it's users.
ReplyDelete