When I worked in data management, there were terms such as "dynamic" and "static" to explain data sets. We can almost use the terms to discuss friendships or any sort of relationship. Heck, even personality types!
But let me ask a question: would you rather be a "dynamic" person? Or a "static" person? Meaning, would you like to adapt and change to the times...or would you just rather stay the same?
I guess on some levels, we can keep some of key qualities but adapt to the times. Or constantly rethink a position. However you want to look at things, we can look at things as being "active" or "passive."
Do you take an "active" approach or a "passive" approach to life?
Which leads me to my ultimate point. I've noticed that since the "good ol' days" (which basically our only forms of media were of the mass approach like television, radio and movies...not the "social" media layer), people have been convenienced out of being personal.
Remember when you could go to the supermarket and ask your check out girl/guy or courtesy desk professional how their families were? Even then, there were "lifers" in that industry, so you could build relationships and trust. Nowadays, how many of us even chat with the people at the registers of a supermarket...let alone GO to one, since many stores are outfitted with "self" checkouts. Even my coblogger and I were talking about how she uses a "gun" to scan her items, then just needs to bag her items and pay when she's all set (think of it as killing two birds with one stone).
Yet I think these conveniences for our busy lifestyles have infiltrated our personal lives. We have seemingly dozens of ways to communicate. Besides Ma Bell, there are even seemingly antiquated methods like "chat" or "messenger," but if you own a smartphone, there's texting, Kik'ing, Tweeting, and even emailing.
And there's Facebook.
I've been on a Facebook cleanse since February. There was no "over the edge" kind of moment. In fact, I had just responded to someone in a message. There wasn't an event or any major argument that set me off. It just...felt like I needed to do it.
But I also had a revelation as I went off, and people started to ask me when I would return.
I'm not sure if I need to. I feel as though I have a clear idea of what's going on with the people I care about. I have kept my Twitter feed active, and there's some overlap there. I am even Instagramming photos.
But there's something else. I felt as though I was being a passive friend. And I think our culture of being convenienced out of being personal has allowed this to be "okay."
It's easy to drop a note on someone's wall to say "Hey, thinkin' boutcha" or "Happy birthday!" Our culture has made it easy to never pick up a phone. Even writing a letter or a written notes of thanks is foreign.
My friend has written a book on Table Manners, and how to integrate this into raising the next generation who will be pointing, clicking, gaming and no doubt texting at a very young age. My fear for the next generation is that there will be NO ONE who chats or communicates by talking anymore. In fact, think of how many families eat dinner at night and are attached to their smartphones. I'm just as guilty. I'll be at lunch and have my phone at the ready while talking to a guest. Shouldn't my attention be focused on ONE person, the one I'm eating lunch with?
Lastly, we live in a culture where calling someone to say hello is almost unheard of. Just this past week, I decided to reach out the old fashioned way to talk to people. I reached out to three friends, and even called someone who had a birthday. Ironically, I wouldn't have known it was his birthday four years ago, when we reconnected on Twitter.
The sound on his voice was surprised...yet he was laughing because he said, "Man, I was just telling a story that I think you would appreciate!" And he proceeded to tell me. Now, maybe if I had reached out on Facebook, he might have told that story. But the phone call was straight, sweet, to the point.
Shortly after my Facebook hiatus, I visited some friends down by where I grew up. It forced me out of my comfort zone. I was able to make plans in person. This is what I mean by being a less passive friend. It's something that the technology driven environment has allowed us to do.
Think about how many people you know "online" whom you'll never ever meet in person. Think about those you have meaningful relationships with in person, but you feel like you're enough in contact with them that you don't need to check in to see how things are.
Being off Facebook makes me wonder - hey, what's going on with these people? It makes me be more available, and what I feel to be more of an active friend.
I'd rather be that dynamic person but wants to appreciate some of the simpler things in life. I can adapt, but I don't want to be in a false sense of security in my relationships.
I want to be an active participant.
Showing posts with label Friendship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Friendship. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Friday, September 7, 2012
Fine Lines of Friendship
My esteemed co-blogger and I have made no secret that we met via social media channels and became friends (and co-bloggers) that way.
We also have friends outside of the social media world that we've known for years. Take for instance the person I know outside of anyone in my family the longest in my life. We met "traditionally" and then when social media became prevalent, we had another method of keeping in touch.
But what I've discovered over the years of this way of life is that the definition of friendship is perhaps a little broader than what we originally thought. Indeed, the landscape may be changing as well.
So the literal Merriam-Webster definition of "Friend" is:
"a : one attached to another by affection or esteem b : acquaintance."
By sorts, the definition of a "Friendship" is:
"1: the state of being friends; 2: the quality or state of being friendly."
A few weeks ago, the friend I've known for over 30 years "deactivated" her Facebook account. People do that to much fanfare usually, but sometimes those looking to get in touch with these persons who deactivate are left in arrears.
"OMG, did they delete me?"
"I'm dying to share this funny joke with them!"
"Is everything okay?"
Yet, with all these modes and channels of communications, we usually miss these announcements and take them very personally if we don't know what's going on.
In some ways, the social media stuff has added a layer of friendship that I'm very grateful for. I met my husband through them, and I can't say for sure that we would have met otherwise. I just have no other way to know. I know someone who reconnected with someone they graduated high school, and they are now dating! (they weren't very good friends otherwise). You just never know.
Yet, at the same this has substituted the idea of calling someone to see what's going on or trying to find out what else is making them tick. Too often, we substitute this for just writing on someone's wall and communicating via "Inbox."
We blame the dumbing down of our culture on reality TV, and 24-hour news cycles have almost given us too MUCH information, exposing biases and not really giving us slanted information to tell us how to think. Have friendships become more disposable as a result of social media?
That same friend I referred to that I've known forever...she has some stories about some people who got upset about a miscommunication on Facebook and never spoke again. Friendships that were solid outside of this layer that became almost narcissistic to a degree. "OMG ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT ME?"
On the other hand, people who didn't know each other outside of these channels, met and otherwise found they didn't have much in common...does that make their friendship less valuable or valid, for that matter?
The answer on one hand, is almost, who gives a shit? A friend is a friend is a friend, right? On the other hand, there are plenty of people who are your "online friends" in name only, and have no intentions of ever meeting you outside of the safe cyberworld where committal is little. (See, I just made that up, catchy isn't it???).
In the meantime, I still find one item prevalent in these relationships. That people will still one another for granted, the same nosy people will dig for the information they want, there will be the obsessive people, the people who care very little or those who will find a way to keep in touch with you, even when you are taking a "Facebook break."
Friendships may have gotten another level, but the complexities behind them are still in our faces whether we like it not. They take work and understanding and not necessarily in that order.
We also have friends outside of the social media world that we've known for years. Take for instance the person I know outside of anyone in my family the longest in my life. We met "traditionally" and then when social media became prevalent, we had another method of keeping in touch.
But what I've discovered over the years of this way of life is that the definition of friendship is perhaps a little broader than what we originally thought. Indeed, the landscape may be changing as well.
So the literal Merriam-Webster definition of "Friend" is:
"a : one attached to another by affection or esteem b : acquaintance."
By sorts, the definition of a "Friendship" is:
"1: the state of being friends; 2: the quality or state of being friendly."
A few weeks ago, the friend I've known for over 30 years "deactivated" her Facebook account. People do that to much fanfare usually, but sometimes those looking to get in touch with these persons who deactivate are left in arrears.
"OMG, did they delete me?"
"I'm dying to share this funny joke with them!"
"Is everything okay?"
Yet, with all these modes and channels of communications, we usually miss these announcements and take them very personally if we don't know what's going on.
In some ways, the social media stuff has added a layer of friendship that I'm very grateful for. I met my husband through them, and I can't say for sure that we would have met otherwise. I just have no other way to know. I know someone who reconnected with someone they graduated high school, and they are now dating! (they weren't very good friends otherwise). You just never know.
Yet, at the same this has substituted the idea of calling someone to see what's going on or trying to find out what else is making them tick. Too often, we substitute this for just writing on someone's wall and communicating via "Inbox."
We blame the dumbing down of our culture on reality TV, and 24-hour news cycles have almost given us too MUCH information, exposing biases and not really giving us slanted information to tell us how to think. Have friendships become more disposable as a result of social media?
That same friend I referred to that I've known forever...she has some stories about some people who got upset about a miscommunication on Facebook and never spoke again. Friendships that were solid outside of this layer that became almost narcissistic to a degree. "OMG ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT ME?"
On the other hand, people who didn't know each other outside of these channels, met and otherwise found they didn't have much in common...does that make their friendship less valuable or valid, for that matter?
The answer on one hand, is almost, who gives a shit? A friend is a friend is a friend, right? On the other hand, there are plenty of people who are your "online friends" in name only, and have no intentions of ever meeting you outside of the safe cyberworld where committal is little. (See, I just made that up, catchy isn't it???).
In the meantime, I still find one item prevalent in these relationships. That people will still one another for granted, the same nosy people will dig for the information they want, there will be the obsessive people, the people who care very little or those who will find a way to keep in touch with you, even when you are taking a "Facebook break."
Friendships may have gotten another level, but the complexities behind them are still in our faces whether we like it not. They take work and understanding and not necessarily in that order.
Monday, December 19, 2011
Talk Amongst Yourselves
I will give you a topic!!
Rhode Island is neither a "road" nor an "Island."
Discuss!!
This is the story of my life. Making sense of is all while using pop culture colloquialisms. I tend to use Sex and the City, Golden Girls, John Landis movies, and Saturday Night Live to fill in the blanks when I need to make an analogy. Sometimes, I use my own life, as my mother, grandmother, and father can usually provide some fodder for figuring out the ambiguities of life.
Because of the in-your-face nature of popular culture, women's emotions are put on display quite a bit. Like "crying at a Hallmark commercial" as an example of women being "emotional" because of that "time of the month" or whatever. Feh. But I've become cognizant of that perception, and maybe I can poke fun at myself because of it. No, I won't cry during commercials. But I do cry during movies.
I can mock cry at situations that actually do mean a lot to me. Once, my mother and I were watching a Behind the Music featuring Cher, and we both started tearing up at Cher's eulogizing of Sonny Bono. Something so silly, that doesn't affect either of us in real life.
Yet, I can sometimes compartmentalize my feelings on situations, to make them funny. This may be a defense mechanism. But when I was out celebrating our mutual birthdays with Dee, her mother (a woman I affectionately refer to as my "aunt") said that she looked on me like a daughter.
And I got verklempt. The Yiddish substitute for "emotional" that Linda Richman, character made famous by actor Mike Myers, that I like to say from time-to-time. Okay. I say it a LOT. I like to say it because in happy situations, even if you want to cry tears of joy, it's all silly. I like to keep life light. So even if there is a reason to be emotional, it shouldn't be too overwhelming. By saying something in Yiddish, I can deflect a lot of it, but still get the point across that it means a lot.
Why do I get "verklempt" to begin with? Sometimes, I get overwhelmed with the bigger picture. I know there is a world that's a lot bigger than me, but I can only just take care of me and those closest to me. I've been around for over 30 years, but people come into my life whom I thought I got along without just fine until I met them. Post-It Notes were a "happy accident" by 3M. My "happy accident" was meeting Dee and her mother.
I don't want to trivialize our relationship by calling it a post-it, but it is truly special and unique. It's something that even at times that I do get really verklempt about things, it's something that can make me smile. Which gets me even MORE verklempt.
That gets me back to the reality that maybe women are more emotional creatures, maybe bigger picture things can hit us harder because we might be more conscience of the idea that we're just little specks on Earth, really.
But in our universe, these specks can be huge to those of us who are the world to us.
From Day One, we know our families. We consider ourselves lucky if we are born into a cool one. They help craft a lot of our humor and our overall personality. Every day after, we use that and go around in life making our own family, taking existential pieces and making an authentic existence. The family you choose is something that you have control over, and it's essential to find people who get the real you.
As Carrie Bradshaw said in the last episode of Sex and the City, "If you can find someone who loves the you YOU love, then, that's just fabulous." I'm lucky enough to have found those people in my life.
Now, isn't this just like buttah?? Discuss!
Rhode Island is neither a "road" nor an "Island."
Discuss!!
This is the story of my life. Making sense of is all while using pop culture colloquialisms. I tend to use Sex and the City, Golden Girls, John Landis movies, and Saturday Night Live to fill in the blanks when I need to make an analogy. Sometimes, I use my own life, as my mother, grandmother, and father can usually provide some fodder for figuring out the ambiguities of life.
Because of the in-your-face nature of popular culture, women's emotions are put on display quite a bit. Like "crying at a Hallmark commercial" as an example of women being "emotional" because of that "time of the month" or whatever. Feh. But I've become cognizant of that perception, and maybe I can poke fun at myself because of it. No, I won't cry during commercials. But I do cry during movies.
I can mock cry at situations that actually do mean a lot to me. Once, my mother and I were watching a Behind the Music featuring Cher, and we both started tearing up at Cher's eulogizing of Sonny Bono. Something so silly, that doesn't affect either of us in real life.
Yet, I can sometimes compartmentalize my feelings on situations, to make them funny. This may be a defense mechanism. But when I was out celebrating our mutual birthdays with Dee, her mother (a woman I affectionately refer to as my "aunt") said that she looked on me like a daughter.
And I got verklempt. The Yiddish substitute for "emotional" that Linda Richman, character made famous by actor Mike Myers, that I like to say from time-to-time. Okay. I say it a LOT. I like to say it because in happy situations, even if you want to cry tears of joy, it's all silly. I like to keep life light. So even if there is a reason to be emotional, it shouldn't be too overwhelming. By saying something in Yiddish, I can deflect a lot of it, but still get the point across that it means a lot.
Why do I get "verklempt" to begin with? Sometimes, I get overwhelmed with the bigger picture. I know there is a world that's a lot bigger than me, but I can only just take care of me and those closest to me. I've been around for over 30 years, but people come into my life whom I thought I got along without just fine until I met them. Post-It Notes were a "happy accident" by 3M. My "happy accident" was meeting Dee and her mother.
I don't want to trivialize our relationship by calling it a post-it, but it is truly special and unique. It's something that even at times that I do get really verklempt about things, it's something that can make me smile. Which gets me even MORE verklempt.
That gets me back to the reality that maybe women are more emotional creatures, maybe bigger picture things can hit us harder because we might be more conscience of the idea that we're just little specks on Earth, really.
But in our universe, these specks can be huge to those of us who are the world to us.
From Day One, we know our families. We consider ourselves lucky if we are born into a cool one. They help craft a lot of our humor and our overall personality. Every day after, we use that and go around in life making our own family, taking existential pieces and making an authentic existence. The family you choose is something that you have control over, and it's essential to find people who get the real you.
As Carrie Bradshaw said in the last episode of Sex and the City, "If you can find someone who loves the you YOU love, then, that's just fabulous." I'm lucky enough to have found those people in my life.
Now, isn't this just like buttah?? Discuss!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)